Last week Charlie Mitchell of the Vicksburg Post wrote that three candidates had 'indefensible acts' on their records. Two regarded charges of personal corruption or incompetence-which are surely indefensible. The third was vetoing a financially risky bill.
Sorry, Charlie, but one of those isn't a great moral crisis. When your ad valorem bill comes in, you won't think it so indefensible.
Of course, Charlie doesn't mention another morally indefensible act, one that we've talked about a lot over here. Oh, well. I guess it'll be talked about Tuesday.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment